Thom Truelove ([info]majormagik) wrote,
@ 2007-01-13 05:56:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current location:Classified
Current mood: discontent
Current music:some hidden track

The President's plan II
Yesterday, William Polk and George McGovern spoke about their book - "Out of Iraq: A Practical Plan for Withdrawal Now" (http://www.amazon.com/Out-Iraq-Practical-Plan-Withdrawal/dp/1416534563). They were overwhelmingly erudite and brilliantly clear about the failures of the plan and recent past plans.

The element of their statements that most plainly stands out is that foreign troops have never once in history been able to stop the sort of war that's now going on in Iraq. Insurgents fight (and always have) to remove the foreigners. We did it here and that's now called The Revolution.

The prediction they made based on analysis of insurgent war is that after an occupying force leaves, the insurgency collapses because the people who have participated in and supported it are too tight to continue fighting. They turn their attention to building a future, which is precisely what Bush is always claiming he hopes for.

Instead, we have a plan from a demonstrably out-of-touch, delusionally power-mad, foolish martinet whose foreign policy is devoid of diplomacy and seems to be a mixture of vendetta and wanna-be war profiteering. Bush has sold our nation's future in the form of debt to China and weakened our military on a war that's daily compared to Vietnam.

And his "new" plan, in my opinion, can be summarized thusly:



"The desert has dried up more blood than you could think of."
~ Auda abu Tayi as portrayed by Anthony Quinn in "Lawrence of Arabia"




(Read 7 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]ns_kumiho
2007-01-16 02:00 pm UTC (link)
This might be interesting:

There are signs of growing opposition in Iran to the policies of hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

A group of reformist and moderate members of parliament have now started collecting signatures to summon him to answer questions about his policies.

Editorials in normally uncritical hardline newspapers have been criticising him for being too aggressive towards the west.

But such criticisms are unlikely to cost Mr Ahmadinejad his job.

UN sanctions

After the UN passed a resolution sanctioning Iran's nuclear programme, more criticism has been voiced inside the country of Mr Ahmadinejad.

It is thought about 50 MPs have signed a document calling for the president to come to parliament and answer questions, but to take affect at least 75 signatures are needed.

If this challenge succeeds, it would be unprecedented, but even Mr Ahmadinejad's opponents recognise it is unlikely they could ever impeach him given the support he enjoys from the supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Surprisingly some hard-line newspapers have started criticising the president in recent days, asking why he has spent so much of Iran's foreign exchange and complaining about the confrontational language he uses on the nuclear issue.

There has also been criticism of the conference the president organised last month questioning the World War II holocaust which lost Iran much sympathy internationally.

Separately, 150 MPs have signed a letter urging the president to base his next budget on realistic assumptions - for example, about future oil prices which are key to Iran's economic forecasts.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6267105.stm

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Read 7 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…